UncommonGoods

search


Pop Culture

Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design

There's a growing menagerie of creatures and beliefs vying for a place on your car bumper
by Matthew Bettelheim
05 April 2007 Comments 12 Comments

Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design
Image: Anne Casselman
The Darwin fish has spawned a family of spin-offs since it first showed up in the 1980s as atheism's mascot.
Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design   Print Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design   Email Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design   Digg

Related Books

In a modern world where religion often finds itself at odds with science, it’s worth keeping in mind that Charles Darwin, the father of evolution, was God’s man.  After he returned from his five year voyage aboard the HMS Beagle, the Anglican naturalist struggled to reconcile his faith with his theory of evolution by natural selection. As can be expected in a world where the fittest survive, evolution won out over creationism. Today we remember Darwin’s legacy by way of a small plastic fish. A fish with legs.

With faith and science seesawing their way through American politics and public school curricula, the Darwin fish’s legs stand firmly in support of science despite the country’s flagging performance in global surveys of science savviness. Nonetheless, with the divine Jesus fish little changed from the primordial soup whence it first arose, it would appear the Darwin fish and its plethora of spin-offs has more than just a leg up on the competition. They have udders, tail-fins, and some wrathful noodly appendages.

That Other Fish in the Sea
The Darwin fish, a spoof of the fish-shaped Christian symbol, first set foot on dry land in the 1980s as an emblem of atheism. Much like finches flitting from island to island, the Darwin fish quickly spread from leaflets and flyers to t-shirts, bumper stickers and ultimately its most famous format, car plaques. To say the fish has evolved since its inception is an understatement. Today, the pantheon of pisces ranges from the religious to the punny to the downright geeky.

Take for example the overweight Buddha fish, or the Hindu fish bedecked with pendulous udders, or Silicon Valley’s own Linux and GNU fish. Space junkies geek out with a USS Enterprise-tailed Trek fish, Alien fish, Science fish, or pointy-eared Yoda fish. There’s even a penis-tipped Freud fish.

The main thrust of the fish, however, remains central to the evolution versus religion debate. Some, like the wrench-toting Evolve fish, are subtle. Others, such as the ProCreation Fish (an Evolution fish humping a Jesus fish), and the Truth fish (pictured eating a Darwin fish), less so. But if any fish encapsulates the twenty-first century grudge match between faith and science, it’s the Flying Spaghetti Monster “fish.”

Have Your Faith and Eat It, Too
In May 2005, Prophet Bobby Henderson wrote a satirical letter to the Kansas State Board of Education demanding that an equal amount of time be allotted to teaching an alternative theory of his own creation, the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM). This was in response to the board’s acceptance of a new intelligent-design lesson plan developed for high-school science classes. Soon thereafter, the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (think noodles + meatball eyes) was born, followed by the March 2006 publication of the FSM Church’s Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

The Church of the FSM’s secretive followers, self-proclaimed Pastafarians, believe that the invisible FSM created the universe; that He uses His Noodly Appendages to change scientific outcomes to conceal his presence; that He is punishing the world with hurricanes, earthquakes and global warming because of the decline in pirates and pirate activity; that Heaven has a stripper factory and beer volcanoes as far as the eye can see; and that every Friday is a holiday.

The FSM Church’s answer to the Darwin fish – the letters “FSM” inside a noodly appendaged, meatball-eyed creature – has topped the sales charts of Ring of Fire Enterprises, the plaque’s manufacturer and distributor. According to co-owner Nona Williams, Ring of Fire Enterprises has sold over 13,000 Flying Spaghetti Monster fish, 5,500 Darwin fish (their second-best seller), and 3,000 of the FSM Church’s Pirate Fish (fourth-best seller) since the FSM debuted in 2005.

The Poll Dance
But can plastic fish – or a plate of spaghetti and meatballs – really serve as a barometer for the United State’s complex view on faith and science, on who created what when how? Well not really, that’s why we have opinion polls.

A 2006 Gallup Poll found that 46% of Americans believe that God created humans as they are today, whereas 35% invoke evolution under God’s guidance. Only 13% of respondents agreed that “human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God had no part in this process.” These percentages have fluctuated litte in the past 25 years.

What has changed, however, are the buzz words. The breakdown of a 2005 Gallup Poll showed that 61% of Americans think evolution belongs in the public school curriculum, just slightly ahead of the percentage of people who think creationism belongs there too (54%). But 2005 saw the first appearance of another “alternative” to evolution, intelligent design, which 43% of respondents thought it should be included in schools as well.

This ongoing struggle might be at the root of abysmal US scores on NSF science literacy tests. When asked the True or False question, “The universe began with a huge explosion,” only 35% of Americans and Russians answered True, compared to South Koreans (67%) and Japanese (63%). Similarly, 44% of Americans and Russians answered True to, “Human beings, as we know them today, developed from earlier species of animals,” well behind Japan (78%), China and the European Union (70%).

But there’s a twist. When these same questions were prefaced with “according to the theory of evolution” and “according to astronomers,” American respondents were more likely to answer the questions correctly (74 and 62%, respectively).

However you look at it, America’s fascination with the Darwin fish is more than a fad. It’s a reflection of the ongoing struggle between faith and science that has confronted Darwin and Dawkins alike. But here’s food for thought. If by some hiccup in the space-time continuum young Darwin had ducked into a gift shoppe before setting sail, it’s no small irony that the father of evolutionary thinking would most likely have chosen a Jesus fish to adhere to the Beagle’s briny stern, right next to the “We Drop Anchor for Galapagos Tortoises” bumper sticker.

Comments 12 Comments | Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design   Print | Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design   Email | Evolution’s Bumper Sticker War Against Intelligent Design   Digg Share

Related Articles





Comments

Though I disagree with the man, I believe that Jonah Goldberg's Opinion on this subject should be covered:

A TELLING CONTEMPT

By JONAH GOLDBERG

April 2, 2008 -- RELEASED on the Internet last week, "Fitna," a film by Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, juxtaposes verses from the Koran with images of jihad.

Heads cut off, bodies blown apart, gays executed, toddlers taught to denounce Jews as "apes and pigs," protesters holding up signs reading "God Bless Hitler" - these are among the images from "Fitna," Arabic for "strife."

Predictably, Muslim governments have condemned the film. Half the Jordanian parliament voted to sever ties with the Netherlands. Egypt's grand imam threatened "severe" consequences.

Meanwhile, European and UN leaders are going through the usual theatrical hand-wringing, heaping anger on Wilders for sowing "hatred."

Me? I keep thinking about Darwin fish. Traditionally, the fish pictogram conjures the miracle of the loaves and fishes as well as the Greek word IXOYE, which means fish and also is an acronym for "Jesus Christ God's Son, Savior." In America, these fish appear mostly on cars.

Recently, it seems Jesus fish have been outnumbered by Darwin fish: The fish is "updated" with little feet on the bottom, and "IXOYE" or "Jesus" replaced by "Darwin" or "Evolve."

The hypocrisy is glaring: Darwin fish are often stuck next to bumper stickers promoting tolerance. But the whole point of the Darwin fish is intolerance; similar mockery of a cherished symbol would rightly be condemned as bigoted if aimed at blacks or women or Muslims.

But it's the Darwin fish's false bravado that grates most. Like so much other Christian-baiting in popular culture, sporting your Darwin fish is a cheap way to speak truth to power, to show courage without consequence.

Whatever the faults of "Fitna," it ain't no Darwin fish. Wilders' film could easily get him killed like Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, murdered in 2004 by a jihadi for criticizing Islam.

"Fitna" is provocative, but it has good reason to provoke. A cancer of violence, bigotry and cruelty is metastasizing within the Islamic world.

It's fine for Muslim moderates to say they aren't part of the cancer; and that some have, in response to the film, is a positive sign. But more often, diagnosing the cancer is dubbed "intolerant," while calls for violence, censorship and even murder are treated as understandable, if regrettable, expressions of anger.

It's not that secular progressives support Muslim religious fanatics, it's that they reserve their passion and scorn for religious Christians who are neither fanatical nor violent.

The Darwin fish ostensibly symbolizes the superiority of science over faith. I think this is a false juxtaposition, but I would have a lot more respect for the folks who believe it if they aimed their brave contempt for religion at those who might behead them for it.

If we're speaking of the Shroud of Turin, the original investigation, by a bishop in the Middle Ages, concluded that it was a fraud and even turned up the artist who had painted it. That's a matter of historical record, whihc is ignored by shroud apologists.

It's a mistake to think that the theory of evolution caused Darwin to lose his faith. He could see evolution as the way in which Creation unfolded. The biggest blow to his faith was the death of his ten-year-old daughter, an incomprehensible blow from a supposedly loving God. The clincher was what he called 'the damnable doctrine" that good, loving people he knew, such as his father, would be condemned to hellfire if they didn't believe in God.

Incidentally, in science "theory" means "explanation," not hypothesis or guess. A theory is a well tested explanation of how something occurs. It is not a term that gets retired once we think something is true. We have a theory of gravitation, too, but we don't expect to float away because "it's only a theory."

Thanks. Very interesting article.It's interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone else's point of view makes you think more. So please keep up the great work.

Thanks for very interesting article. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. It?s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone else?s point of view? makes you think more. So please keep up the great work.
All the best

Thanks Tim

“according to the theory of evolution” and “according to astronomers,” Looks to me like the American and Russian kids gave the most correct answer each time. Evolution and the Big Bang are stated as theories, even though most of the scientifically literate world accepts them as fact. For some reason the more curturally rigid Asian countries failed to make that distinction.

Thanks Tim. We've corrected our grievous error.

The initial paragraph is wildly incorrect. At the time of his voyage on the Beagle, Darwin was a ardent Creationist. It wasn't until he returned from the journey and had a taxonomist classify his collection that he discovered that the wild variety of birds that he had collected were all in fact finches, which started to raise doubts that eventually led to the Theory of Evolution.

I can't wait for ths to hit the media and the evolutionist fairy tale!

NOTICE:
April AD 2007

The scientific world of physics is undergoing a revolutionary change: a paradigm shift of universe proportions and implications.

The Shroud has produced three-dimensional images of
a body moving in space. Please seek your own trustworthy sources of verification.

Sir Isaac Newton would not be surprised. Joel 3:14 kjv

Have a truly Happy Resurrection Day!

semper fidelis
Jim Baxter
Santa Maria, CA

You missed the best one!

<a href="">http://braindex.com/encyclopedia/images/b/b7/T-Rex_200.jpg</a>

Michael Dowd is a liberal Christian minister married to a science writer. He's a former fundamentalist who has come to see in the story of Evolution and the Big Bang the possibility for a new unifying mythos that can speak to our spiritual needs while honoring scientific truth. He says that he has toured the country in a vehicle in which a Jesus fish is kissing a Darwin fish.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.