UncommonGoods

search


Green & Crunchy

Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?

A San Francisco law wants zero emissions out of your shopping bag, but ignores how many go into it
by Eva Amsen
25 April 2007 Comments 4 Comments

Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?
Image: Carlos Gustavo Curado
Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?   Print Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?   Email Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?   Digg

Related Books

Late last week, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom signed a plastic shopping-bag ban into law. Within the next six months, large supermarkets must stop using standard plastic bags. Large chain pharmacies must follow suit within the year. Instead, they can use recycled paper bags or biodegradable “bioplastic” ones.

But one question remains: Are biodegradable plastics really as eco-friendly as they seem?

Regular supermarket grocery bags are made from petroleum-based plastics. They’re usually used once and thrown out. Some facilities collect bags for recycling, but since these bags are made from a mix of materials and often contaminated by food, their yield is very low.

Biodegradable plastics seem like a great solution. They are usually made from starch and come from starch-rich plants like corn. Unlike fossil fuels, plants are renewable resources. On top of that, any carbon dioxide belched out as the bioplastic composts should have come from the atmosphere as the corn grew, leading to a net effect of no emissions. It seems almost too good to be true. 

But engineers Tillman Gerngross from Darmouth University and Steven Slater from Arizona State University are long-time critics of biodegradable plastics. A few years ago they did the math and found that some bioplastics production emits more carbon dioxide than the production of normal bags made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). This is especially true for the biopolymer polyhydroxyalkonate (PHA).

The culprit is the large amount of energy that goes into farming, fertilizing and fermenting corn. Gerngross and Slater voiced their concern in a 2003 letter to Science: “Biodegradable polymers can convert a solid waste disposal problem into an air pollution problem, an approach that is clearly at odds with current international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

There is another catch to the bio-bags: they only degrade if microorganisms can get at them. Bags in landfills don’t degrade well at all, whether they’re biodegradable or not. Biodegradable bags can take 10–45 days to degrade in a controlled composting environment, but then they release even more CO2. Then again, if we wind up littering the wild with biodegradable bags (i.e., stuck in trees or floating in lakes, where they can take 8–12 months to decay) they will at least break down and reduce the risk of injury to animals or clogged sewer pipes.

So what is the best solution to the grocery bag waste problem? Not using them in the first place. Reusable bags are far more eco-friendly (and pretty) than disposable bags of any kind.

Comments 4 Comments | Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?   Print | Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?   Email | Do Biodegradable Bags Make Disposable Ones OK?   Digg Share

Related Articles





Comments

If you haven’t done it already, its really time to get some reusable shopping bags to cut down on our plastic waste. You can read Kate’s post on canvas tote bags where she talks about some fabulous, fashionable bag options. Or try out Baggu — they come in 19 different colors at $8 for one, $22 for three, or $38 for six.

What do people in SF use for garbage bags?

Seattle is looking at taxing grocery bags 20 cents in efforts to promote green solutions. I've always re-used disposable grocery bags for refuse, and have never purchased garbage bags.

I would rather use biodegradable grocery bags made from renewable resources than have to purchase garbage bags.

The threat to marine animals from plastic bags cannot be understated. It is so high that even the US Navy enacted a safe plastic emissions policy, something I had to help implement. All US Navy trash is segregated so that plastics can be melted into a large, dense block for safe disposal ashore.

The removal of permanent plastic bags from the marine environment (where many of them eventually turn up) is a very worthy goal in itself, and probably worth the short-term increase in CO2 emissions. In the long run it ought to be possible to increase the efficiency of the fermentation process.

I always use paper.

But on the other hand, San Francisco is aiming for zero waste by 2020. And even better, plans are already being implemented in the East Bay, and will probably also happen in SF, to process all compostable waste in biodigesters to break it down as much as possible before the remainder goes to landfill. Norcal Waste, which serves much of the Bay Area, has a goal of running its garbage trucks on biogas that will use the methane captured from the digestion process. (I interviewed Norcal's vice president of sustainability, Chris Choate, in early February, which is why I know my garbage so well.)

Of course, none of this changes the amount of CO2 yielded by the bag during its production and life cycle. I certainly agree that people should reuse their own bags - I've been doing so for several years.

And I wonder, what's the worse use of corn in terms of CO2 generation - these bio-plastic bags or ethanol?

Commenting is not available in this section entry.